Description
Print advertisement created by Publicis, Luxembourg for Luxembourg Government, within the category: Public Interest, NGO.
If you pay a prostitute, you're financing human trading.
Art Director: Patrick Bertrand
Copywriter: Matthieu Dusart
Photographer: Bernard Blistin
hmmmm visual imply a trade with human organs so it doesn't match much with whole story.
________
When you don't pay her you have a big problem.
WHERE ARE HER NIPS!!!!
"hmmmm visual imply a trade with human organs so it doesn't match much with whole story."
Why? Because when you buy human organs, they're shrink-wrapped?
If you are a prostitute too....
I think it must be quite a hassle to have to translate all these non-English ads into English, re-typeset them, etc etc for awards and for general consumption. I wonder if ads in languages other than English shouldn't just be submitted as they are - but with an Eng translation as a judges' note. In any event, there can be no excuse for using exclamation marks - and putting the ! a space away from the word.
great work
Nice art but it doesnt make any scence
I don't know about you guys but I actually wanna get in there with that hootie.
Glad I'm not the only one. I'd pay to fuck her. Or would if she had nipples.
done..done..done..again..and again..execution for this campaign themes..
Always make sure you get a freelance girl then : )
Great work....
If you pay a prostitute, you're financing human trading.
True. Thats why i never pay prostitutes. lol
So done back in the 80'
though this is an interesting medium to use, but d.o.n.e.
>> that look on the young lady seems more sultry. I thought a 'scared' expression will probably work better.
at least the expression can convey the message like 'You are actually f-ing someone who is totally ignorant about what is happening right now.'
if I'm a guy, and if I can see that she's tearing or something. scared.. etc, I'll probably feel bad and stop 'patronizing'. (:
As activation idea it was good. But as a ad in magazine i think its little weak.
UDAYpatwardhan@+91 22 98206 54722
I believe the creative director was showing her as a 'peice of meat'. I love the campaign, think it is nicely shot and produced. Exclamation point aside. lbilben (http://twitter.com/lbilben)
copy, this idea was used before!
why do u want to stop her when she seems to be enjoyin? Patrick Bertrand, the art director must be a close friend of her. Patrick sold her frined more than the message.
one separate query. is it mandatory to use nudity to pass a anti sex selling message? Its like saying i need a cigarette to work on my anti smoking campaign.
shahid
1. the model were payed for the production. isn't it human trading too?
2. and having fun with a prostitute without paying her is worse.
I like the thought, but there is a failure in the logic.
The big problem I have is that the headline statement isn't true. If you are paying a prostitute it doesn't necessarily mean you are paying for human trafficking. Not all prostitutes become prostitutes because they were forced into it through human trafficking. The headline needs to be rethought.
This page may contain elements which are considered Not Safe For Work.
Latest Collections
Highlighted LGBTQ Advertising
