Advertisement

Comments (8)

Log in or register to post comments

Highest Rated

Guest's picture
Guest

The simplest, the best.

Guest's picture
Guest

I'm laughing it.

Guest's picture
Guest

Extremely outdated and easy idea.

Guest's picture
Guest

The simplest, the best.

ricklongo's picture
ricklongo
Activity Score 1244

The original? http://adsoftheworld.com/media/print/hertz_nokia

This? Not so original.

Really really overused technique of changing known brands/logos.

And for the record, the campaign I link also sucks hard.

joelapompe's picture
joelapompe
Activity Score 3853

yeah, mixing (and hijacking) logotypes is an old idea. And I knew somone would try to argue that it was not original :-) You're not surprising dude...
Anyway as long as it was not hijacked the exact same way (and with the same brand involved) for the same kind of product/service it's not a "copycat" to me! Or if you say so... all ads containing the Statue of Liberty are copycats?

Guest's picture
Guest

Exactly.

Too many people go round throwing the 'done' word at ads, simply because they used a similar/same element or device as other ads. Logo manipulation is just a device, it can be used and used again to convey different messages.

It's like seeing an ad and saying, "Wait a minute, this ad features a car driving along a coastline!! I've seen that before!! Done!! Done!! The old 'car driving on coastline' thing. So done!"

People need to grasp the difference between 'done' and 'similar'.

Guest's picture
Guest

Yet the "Pasta from the past" ad you posted on your site is for different products/service and is hardly hijacked the exact same way.

Guest's picture
Guest

Just OK guys.
This one 'specialy funny.

Advertisement